Ohio Casinos Fight Back Against Sports Betting Expansion Bill

Spread the Word:

Ohio Casino owners have fought back against a proposed expansion in gambling that could allow even Ford Motor Company to have sports betting.

On Wednesday, Ohio Senate Select Committee on Gaming met for a brief period in its first hearing to get its sports betting bill- SB 176- to the floor of the legislature before the governor’s desk for final signature.

Just two state senators, who co-sponsored the bill, testified and announced changes to the bill. Under the changes, the bill would also allow uncapped mobile licenses in an unprecedented setup in US sports betting.

The proposal has every reason to provoke Ohio casino owners who responded swiftly.

What Did Ohio Casino Owners Say?

A press release from Get Gaming Right Ohio warned that SB 176 would create slot-like electronic bingo games in as many as 900 locations across the Buckeye State. The group- supported by MGM Resorts International, Jack Entertainment, and Penn National- is committed to educating the residents about the need for responsible, limited, and legalized sports betting. It warned that these new gambling locations would offer “unprecedented and unchecked gambling access” to the state residents, including teenagers.

Critics of the organization however maintain the so-called altruistic warning by the organization is more about the vested interest than a concern for the general public.

Why Are Casino Owners Against the Gambling Expansion?

MGM, JACK, and Penn own seven of the 11 casinos and racinos in Ohio. Any gambling bill expanding slot-like machines is against their business interests. For the same reason, Get Gaming Right Casino also rejected HB 65, which calls for electronic bingo expansion.

The three operators are also perturbed over reports they might not be awarded Ohio sports betting licenses.

What Happened on Wednesday?

Ohio Senate Select Committee Gaming hearing concluded in 15 minutes, and all that brief duration was dedicated to change a few aspects of the bill.

Sen. Nathan Manning, the vice-chair of the committee and co-sponsor of the bill, explained changes, dealing with the two types of sports betting licenses.

The 20 Type-A licenses, meant for mobile operators who must tether to companies with “substantial Ohio presence”.

Any mobile sportsbook may connect to one of the 11 existing casinos or racinos in Ohio. But it may not if it wants to partner with any non-casino entity. “For the Type A, it clarifies that you do need to have some sort of presence in Ohio.”

Manning clarified that they are not restricting the Type A licenses to a racino/casino; they can use them as a presence or they can use some other presence. “Whether they want to set up shop here themselves, or someone threw out the example if Ford wanted to have a license… somebody that has people working and presence in Ohio.”

Moreover, language in the text was changed regarding Type A license holders to “subcontract with as many (online operators) as they want,” Manning said.

Another Big Change for Type B Licenses

Another significant change involved Type B, land-based sportsbook licenses. In the original text, Type A license holders could not seek a Type B license, meaning existing casinos/racinos would be excluded from retail sports betting. The new changes allowed for a Type A license holder to also have a Type B license.

In addition, another change increased the discretionary power of the Casino Control Commission over deciding and awarding licenses. The commission is likely to consider the matter while keeping the fact which potential operator would be economically more viable for the state. The original bill would be based on a “first come, first serve” element in decision making.

An Open-Market Approach

The three casino operators have not made any public comment as the Wednesday meeting did not include any public testimony. But the outcome of the meeting is not likely to bring any rejoice to them.

But the bill’s two joint sponsors and other lawmakers said they preferred an open-market approach, meaning those 40 licenses would be granted through open bidding.

Most stakeholders, including casinos, pro sports teams, and leagues in the state, had lobbied for the mobile licenses to be tethered with existing gaming operations.

Related News

Ohio senate house
November 22, 2020

Ohio Sports Betting Bill Sees Snail’s Pace Progress

Ohio progresses towards legalizing sports betting is at a snail’s pace amid the political transition after the state election. The discussion on sports betting is currently stalled following a Senate […]

read more
Hollywood Casino Ohio
November 16, 2020

Ohio Casinos & Racinos Post Record Revenue in October

Ohio casinos and racinos have achieved another record month in October while posting $169 million in gambling revenue. According to Ohio Casino Control Commission that released its data on Monday, […]

read more
Ohio Capital
June 14, 2021

Ohio Sports Betting Bill Sees Key Changes In Quick Committee Meeting

The Ohio Senate Select Committee met briefly Wednesday afternoon to announce key changes to the proposed sports betting bill – SB 176. The committee, which met for the 14th time […]

read more
Richmond, Virginia
June 18, 2021

Virginia Lottery Flooded With Sportsbook Applications Against Limited Licenses

As many as 18 applicants have applied for the Virginia sports betting license against five available in the state, according to a lottery official. The applications are currently being reviewed […]

read more
Las Vegas sign
February 26, 2021

Nevada Sports Betting Bounces Back with $646M Handle in January

Following two consecutive declining months, Nevada sports betting posted its second-highest ever handle in January with $646.5 million. It was just the fourth time the Silver State crossed the $600 […]

read more
Parx casino Pennsylvania
June 7, 2021

Pennsylvania Casinos Lose Legal Battle Against Lottery Over Online Offerings

The Pennsylvania Lottery has recently won a legal battle against the state’s seven casinos trying to shut down the lottery’s online games. While rejecting the lawsuit filed by casino owners, […]

read more
June 12, 2019

New Hampshire Judge Rules Against DOJ’s Wire Act iGaming Ban

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) won’t be able to use the Wire Act of 1961 to ban online casino and poker games, thanks to a recent ruling from the […]

read more
California tribes ad campaign
March 22, 2022

California Tribes Launch Ad Campaign Against Online Sports Betting Initiative

What appears to be the first major attack in the pitched battle for California sports betting, three state tribes launched Tuesday a TV ad campaign against the operator-led mobile sports […]

read more
NFL players
March 25, 2021

Bally’s Corporation Completes Acquisition of Monkey Knife Fight

Bally’s Corporation announced the completion of a deal to acquire Monkey Knife Fight, the third-largest daily fantasy sports operator in North America. According to the news release issued Tuesday, the […]

read more
Alabama sign
March 22, 2021

Alabama Senate Committee Passes Lottery Bill for Gambling Expansion

An Alabama Senate committee approved a lottery bill Wednesday to put the issue of gambling before voters for the first time in decades. The state’s Senate Tourism and Marketing Committee […]

read more
February 14, 2021

Sisolak Rolls Back COVID-19 Restrictions on Nevada Casinos

Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak announced Thursday to roll back the COVID-19 restrictions imposed in November that limited casino capacity to 25%. The capacity limit will be lifted in phases starting […]

read more
Florida Coast
August 23, 2021

Fresh Lawsuit Filed Against Feds Over Florida Sports Betting

Another lawsuit has been filed against the Department of Interior over its approval of the Florida sports betting compact earlier this month. Florida sports betting law allows the Seminole exclusive […]

read more

Stay Updated & Receive Exclusive Offers

Be the first to know when new states legalize online gambling and gain access to exclusive casino and sports betting promotional offers.